Documentation/Confidence Scoring & Gap Detection
Confidence Scoring & Gap Detection
Every answer CoTeam gives — through Ask, the Chrome extension, Forward-to-Answer, or a questionnaire review — carries a confidence score. This is the mechanism that keeps CoTeam from ever quietly guessing.
The three tiers
| Tier | Meaning | What to do |
|---|
| 🟢 High confidence | Directly sourced from your knowledge base, with a citation to the exact document. | Safe to send as-is. |
| 🟡 Medium confidence | Inferred from related content in your knowledge base — not a direct match, but a reasonable extrapolation. | Review before sending. CoTeam shows its reasoning and the sources it drew from. |
| 🔴 Low confidence | No good source found in your knowledge base. | CoTeam does not fabricate an answer. It flags the gap and names the specific document that would resolve it. |
Confidence is always shown alongside its source citation — you can see exactly which document an answer is grounded in, not just a percentage.
Gap detection
When CoTeam can't find a good source, it doesn't guess and it doesn't stay silent. Instead:
- It names the missing document specifically. Not "add more docs" — a concrete recommendation like "Add your SSO/provisioning guide," based on what the question actually asked.
- It never fabricates to fill the silence. A low-confidence answer is always labeled as such. CoTeam will not present a guess as a sourced fact.
- One upload closes it everywhere. Add the missing document once, and every future question and questionnaire on that topic is answered from it going forward — you don't have to fix the same gap twice.
Where gaps surface
Gaps show up at both levels of the product:
- In Ask, inline on the answer card itself, with an "Add document" action right there.
- In a questionnaire, sorted to the top of your review queue automatically, since answers are ordered lowest-to-highest confidence — you see every gap before you see anything else.
- On the Knowledge Base page, as a running gap feed clustered by topic, so you can see patterns across many questions rather than one at a time.
The flywheel
Confidence scoring and gap detection are what make CoTeam's accuracy compound over time, rather than staying static:
- Edit an answer → saved as a knowledge base correction for that specific question type
- Add a document to fill a gap → that topic is answered for all future questionnaires
- Approve a high-confidence answer → reinforces that source in retrieval, making it more likely to surface again for similar questions
- An SME submits an answer → their expertise is captured and reused automatically
None of this requires a separate "training" step. The knowledge base you're already building by using the product is the same thing that improves it.